Structural Modeling of Systematic Risk Management in the Iranian Capital Market: An ISM–MICMAC Approach

Authors

  • Hamidreza Matinfar * Department of Accounting and Management, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-2308
  • Narges Yazdanian Department of Accounting and Management, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-2492
  • Seyed Alireza Mir Arab Beigi Department of Accounting and Management, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22105/aaa.v3i1.90

Abstract

Systematic risk is one of the fundamental challenges in financial markets, and conventional approaches to addressing it have primarily focused on quantitative measurement and control instruments. However, experiences from financial crises indicate that reliance solely on these approaches—without considering institutional structures and policy frameworks—cannot achieve sustainable management of systematic risk. This study adopts a structural approach to analyze the factors influencing systematic risk management in the Iranian capital market, examining the roles of institutional, policy, and instrument-based factors within a causal framework. The research methodology integrates qualitative thematic analysis with Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC) analysis. Data were derived from the structural judgments of experts in capital markets, financial policy, and risk management, and the final indicators were analyzed within a hierarchical structure. Findings indicate that institutional and policy factors occupy the foundational levels of the causal structure and act as key drivers shaping the behavior of the entire system, whereas financial instruments primarily occupy intermediate and outcome levels. These results suggest that systematic risk in the Iranian capital market is structural and endogenous in nature, and its effective management requires attention to institutional drivers and policy patterns. By providing a structural analytical framework, this study contributes to the literature on systematic risk management in emerging markets and offers a foundation for forward-looking policy design.

Keywords:

Systematic risk, Structural risk management, Institutional and policy factors, Interpretive Structural Modeling–Multiplication applied to classification, Iranian capital market

References

  1. [1] Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of political economy, 91(3), 401–419. https://knowledge.uchicago.edu/record/4957/files/Bank-Runs-Deposit-Insurance-and-Liquidity.pdf
  2. [2] Laeven, L., Maddaloni, A., & Mendicino, C. (2022). Monetary policy, macroprudential policy and financial stability. https://doi.org/10.2866/919182
  3. [3] Claessens, S., Kose, M. A., & Terrones, M. E. (2012). How do business and financial cycles interact? Journal of international economics, 87(1), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.11.008
  4. [4] Danielsson, J., Shin, H. S., & Zigrand, J. P. (2010). Risk appetite and endogenous risk. Financial Markets Group. https://www.fmg.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-08/risk-apetite.pdf
  5. [5] Claessens, S., Ghosh, S. R., & Mihet, R. (2013). Macro-prudential policies to mitigate financial system vulnerabilities. Journal of international money and finance, 39, 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.06.023
  6. [6] Adrian, T., Covitz, D., & Liang, N. (2015). Financial stability monitoring. Annual review of financial economics, 7(1), 357–395. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-042008
  7. [7] Tobias, A., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2016). CoVaR. The american economic review, 106(7), 1705. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120555
  8. [8] Ebadi, J., Elahi, N., & Gohar, S. H. (2020). Systemic risk and mutual fund. Quarterly journal of applied theories of economics, 7(2), 199–222. https://ecoj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_11286_b11d728908cbd20c1af30cedd3eb3efc.pdf
  9. [9] Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
  10. [10] Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American economic review, 105(2), 564–608. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130456
  11. [11] Battiston, S., Gatti, D. D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). Default cascades: When does risk diversification increase stability? Journal of financial stability, 8(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2012.01.002
  12. [12] Poledna, S., & Thurner, S. (2016). Elimination of systemic risk in financial networks by means of a systemic risk transaction tax. Quantitative finance, 16(10), 1599–1613. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.8026
  13. [13] North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge Univ Pr. https://books.google.com/books
  14. [14] Buch, C. M., & Goldberg, L. S. (2020). Global banking: Toward an assessment of benefits and costs. Annual review of financial economics, 12(1), 141–175. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/economists/goldberg/2020_buch_goldberg_global_banking.pdf?la=en
  15. [15] Aikman, D., Galesic, M., Gigerenzer, G., Kapadia, S., Katsikopoulos, K., Kothiyal, A., … & Neumann, T. (2021). Taking uncertainty seriously: Simplicity versus complexity in financial regulation. Industrial and corporate change, 30(2), 317–345.
  16. [16] Borio, C. (2014). The financial cycle and macroeconomics: What have we learnt? Journal of banking & finance, 45, 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.031
  17. [17] Hull, J. C., & Basu, S. (2016). Options, futures, and other derivatives. Pearson Education India. https://personal.lse.ac.uk/ROBERT49/teaching/ph232/pdf/Hull-Ch1.pdf
  18. [18] Gorton, G., Metrick, A., Shleifer, A., & Tarullo, D. K. (2010). Regulating the shadow banking system [with comments and discussion]. Brookings papers on economic activity, 261–312. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41012848
  19. [19] Stulz, R. M. (2008). Risk management failures: What are they and when do they happen? Journal of applied corporate finance, 20(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2008.00202.x
  20. [20] Altunbaş, Y., Polizzi, S., Scannella, E., & Thornton, J. (2022). European Banking Union and bank risk disclosure: The effects of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 58(2), 649–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-01005-z
  21. [21] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. https://www.academia.edu/download/55010759/creswell_Qualitative_In%20quiry_2nd_edition.pdf
  22. [22] Mirashk, H., Albadvi, A., Kargari, M., & Rastegar, M. A. (2024). News Sentiment and Liquidity Risk Forecasting: Insights from Iranian Banks. Risks, 12(11), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12110171
  23. [23] Warfield, J. N. (2010). Developing subsystem matrices in structural modeling. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 4(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1974.5408523
  24. [24] Hou, G., Rahman, M. N. A., Zain, C. R. C. M., Shao, Y., & Wahab, A. N. A. (2026). Prioritizing critical success factors for implementation of green-lean product development in industry 4.0 era. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-17359-w
  25. [25] Liu, W., Hu, Y., & Huang, Q. (2024). Research on critical factors influencing organizational resilience of major transportation infrastructure projects: A hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC approach. Buildings, 14(6), 1598. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061598
  26. [26] Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., May, R. M., Roukny, T., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). The price of complexity in financial networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 113(36), 10031–10036. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521573113
  27. [27] Chiriacescu, B. (2013). Macroprudential policy and financial stability. Theoretical and applied economics, 20(2), 579. https://store.ectap.ro/articole/830.pdf
  28. [28] Cont, R., & Schaanning, E. (2017). Fire sales, indirect contagion and systemic stress testing. Indirect contagion and systemic stress testing. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2541114
  29. [29] Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., D’Errico, M., & Gurciullo, S. (2016). Leveraging the network: A stress-test framework based on DebtRank. Statistics & risk modeling, 33(3–4), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1515/strm-2015-0005
  30. [30] Bahaj, S., & Foulis, A. (2016). Macroprudential policy under uncertainty. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2726526
  31. [31] Kahn, C. M., & Roberds, W. (2009). Why pay? An introduction to payments economics. Journal of financial intermediation, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2008.09.001
  32. [32] Borio, C., & Zhu, H. (2012). Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: a missing link in the transmission mechanism?. Journal of financial stability, 8(4), 236-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2011.12.003

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Accounting and Auditing with Applications (AAA)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Accounting and Auditing with Applications

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Matinfar, H. ., Yazdanian, N. ., & Mir Arab Beigi, S. A. . (2026). Structural Modeling of Systematic Risk Management in the Iranian Capital Market: An ISM–MICMAC Approach. Accounting and Auditing With Applications , 3(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.22105/aaa.v3i1.90

Similar Articles

41-49 of 49

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.